Glamour Skins to the 9s

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:37 pm

Royal combat-armor 2.0
Now with integrated energy barrier instead of bulky metal shield.

Hidden/Spoiler:

Webster27 · Post by **Webster27** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:42 pm

looks good, if it's ment to be so shiny and clean

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:46 pm

Webster27 wrote:looks good, if it's ment to be so shiny and clean

A new Prototype in Sword Fighting 2's alternative storyline, has never seen a battle. If it had scratches I'd take proceedings against the producer.

Anakin · Post by **Anakin** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:59 pm

nice skin

Webster27 · Post by **Webster27** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:30 pm

Bob wrote:
Webster27 wrote:looks good, if it's ment to be so shiny and clean
A new Prototype in Sword Fighting 2's alternative storyline, has never seen a battle. If it had scratches I'd take proceedings against the producer.

Then, well done !

Fiodis · Post by **Fiodis** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:44 pm

Nicely done skin. What weapon model is that?

RevanSithLord · Post by **RevanSithLord** » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:56 pm

Fiodis wrote:Nicely done skin. What weapon model is that?

Reskinned Imperial Heavy Repeater from Jedi Outcast and Academy it looks like.

The skin is very nicely done, Bob. Great job!

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:17 am

RevanSithLord wrote:
Fiodis wrote:Nicely done skin. What weapon model is that?
Reskinned Imperial Heavy Repeater from Jedi Outcast and Academy it looks like.

Exactly. I thought it would go better with the skin if i changed the color of the yellow parts to light gray.

[Padawan]Helkaan · Post by **[Padawan]Helkaan** » Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:12 am

There as been some sand here.

Hidden/Spoiler:

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:29 am

[Padawan]Helkaan wrote:There as been some sand here.
Hidden/Spoiler:

Nice

I suggest adding some sand to the upper arms.
And on some places the sand is suspiciously yellow

RevanSithLord · Post by **RevanSithLord** » Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:12 am

Well, looks like someone's been through a sandstorm.

Good times were had, right? Nice job.

yuke5 · Post by **yuke5** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:29 am

Nice work! You may want to use one of those remapped troopers though. That way, the sand patterns won't be symmetrical and generates a more realistic effect. That being said, the wear and tear looks really great!

lucasfart · Post by **lucasfart** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:06 am

Nice work, but I'm not sure you'd get that much sand sticking to a stormtrooper.

kinetosimpetus · Post by **kinetosimpetus** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:12 am

In a dry desert like Tatooine, I would think you'd get nothing but a fine dusting that would actually stick to the armor or fill in scratches, but on Kashyyyk where the beach sand is wet it would be stickier.

THEWULFMAN · Post by **THEWULFMAN** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:49 am

I'm leaning towards agreeing with Kinetos, although I think it would be a bit more than a fine dusting.
Plus, we have proper references.

Hidden/Spoiler:

lucasfart · Post by **lucasfart** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:08 am

Just because it's in a star wars movie doesn't mean it's really like that.

They just did that to make the stormies look more interesting. Besides, who says that's sand on their armour?

But I also agree with kinetos - it depends where you are as to what sand effect you'd use.

Bob · Post by **Bob** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:15 am

lucasfart wrote:Besides, who says that's sand on their armour?

It would be ridiculous if not

THEWULFMAN · Post by **THEWULFMAN** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:06 pm

lucasfart wrote:Just because it's in a star wars movie doesn't mean it's really like that. They just did that to make the stormies look more interesting.

Uh... that's an... interesting way of looking at it. You could use that logic with practically anything. If the movies aren't an accurate depiction of what Star Wars is supposed to look like, what is? And why do you think they only added sand to the armor just to look interesting? That's trying to be realistic and practical, not "interesting." Being interesting is having holographic interfaces, anti-gravity devices, and lightsabers. Being practical and realistic is showing wear and tear on space ships and weapons(which Star Wars is known for). The difference being, trying to be "interesting" implies there is little logic behind it and it is just there to be cool. Being practical and realistic means they try to make things look as they should, with worn down ships and dirty armor.

Fiodis · Post by **Fiodis** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:05 pm

THEWULFMAN wrote:Being practical and realistic means they try to make things look as they should, with worn down ships and dirty armor.

But the stormies have gleaming white armor on Endor, when they should be either camo'd or caked with dirt! Plus, if I saw my stormies walking around with their armor in a total state like those on Tatooine, I'd hand them a court-martial. Every stormie's armor must be regulation Imperial White.

Anyway, I think lucasfart was half-joking (since he put that tongue-sticking-out smilie there).

Marth8880 · Post by **Marth8880** » Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:35 pm

Lol, are we seriously arguing about the state of wear and tear that the armor should be in?

Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s

Re: Glamour Skins to the 9s